Strategic Scenario Planning for Mining-Fleet Investment Decisions Under Energy-Cost and Carbon Uncertainty

Authors

  • Dhimas Cahya Rifbyan School of Business and Management, Institut Teknologi Bandung
  • Noorhan Firdaus Pambudi School of Business and Management, Institut Teknologi Bandung

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32502/j6zt2g36

Keywords:

ESG Strategies, Fleet Electrification, Scenario Planning, Strategic Foresight, Strategic Investment Decision

Abstract

Purpose– This study examines an operations decision faced by a mining contractor: which powertrain to choose when replacing a diesel haul fleet, given that each option's merit depends on futures the firm cannot control, namely the diesel price, the cost of electric trucks, and the carbon intensity of the charging grid.

Design/methodology– The study is a single embedded case study of a 28-truck haul fleet at a coal concession in Central Kalimantan, Indonesia. It applies a four-phase intuitive-logics scenario-planning cycle: identifying driving forces, isolating two critical uncertainties, energy-cost pressure and electric-vehicle accessibility, building four scenarios from their two-by-two, and comparing five powertrain pathways within each future on cost, carbon, operational risk, and disclosure readiness.

Findings– Solar-powered electrification remains a reliable pathway across all four future scenarios, while diesel is only sustainable when diesel prices are low. Grid-powered electrification is the lowest-cost option but a misstep for carbon-emissions reduction, as a coal-dominated grid increases fleet emissions by 46 to 56 percent. The same energy cost factors determine the future scenarios and drive the economics of each pathway, so the right choice changes with future assumptions. The paper contributes a replicable decision architecture that couples scenario planning with real-options reasoning, giving managers of capital-intensive fleets a way to stage an irreversible electrification commitment under deep energy-cost and carbon uncertainty rather than treating it as a one-off comparison.

References

Amer, M., Daim, T. U., & Jetter, A. (2013). A review of scenario planning. Futures, 46, 23–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2012.10.003

BloombergNEF. (2025). Lithium-ion battery pack prices fall to $108 per kilowatt-hour, despite rising metal prices. Bloomberg New Energy Finance.

Bradfield, R., Wright, G., Burt, G., Cairns, G., & Van der Heijden, K. (2005). The origins and evolution of scenario techniques in long-range business planning. Futures, 37(8), 795–812. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2005.01.003

Flyvbjerg, B. (2006). Five misunderstandings about case-study research. Qualitative Inquiry, 12(2), 219–245. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800405284363

Furr, N. R., & Eisenhardt, K. M. (2021). Strategy and uncertainty: Resource-based view, strategy-creation view, and the hybrid between them. Journal of Management, 47(7), 1915–1935. https://doi.org/10.1177/01492063211011760

Garvin, D. A., & Levesque, L. C. (2006). A note on scenario planning (HBS No. 9-306-003). Boston, MA: Harvard Business School.

Haarhaus, T., & Liening, A. (2020). Building dynamic capabilities to cope with environmental uncertainty: The role of strategic foresight. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 155, 120033. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2020.120033

Kügemann, M., & Polatidis, H. (2020). Multicriteria decision analysis of road transportation fuels and vehicles: A systematic review and classification of the literature. Energies, 13(1), 157. https://doi.org/10.3390/en13010157

Marinković, M., Al-Tabbaa, O., Khan, Z., & Wu, J. (2022). Corporate foresight: A systematic literature review and future research trajectories. Journal of Business Research, 144, 289–311. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2022.01.097

Meiliani, F., Djazuli, A., & Utami, D. (2024). Determinan sustainable growth pada perusahaan sektor barang konsumen non-primer di Indonesia. Motivasi: Jurnal Manajemen dan Bisnis, 9(1), 88–97. https://doi.org/10.32502/mti.v9i1.8390

Montibeller, G., Gummer, H., & Tumidei, D. (2006). Combining scenario planning and multicriteria decision analysis in practice. Journal of Multicriteria Decision Analysis, 14(1–3), 5–20. https://doi.org/10.1002/mcda.403

Pradnyani, I. G. A. A., & Widhiastuti, N. L. P. (2024). Peran profitabilitas dalam memoderasi pengaruh kebijakan dividen dan struktur modal terhadap nilai perusahaan. Motivasi: Jurnal Manajemen dan Bisnis, 9(1), 37–47. https://doi.org/10.32502/mti.v9i1.7936

Ram, C., Montibeller, G., & Morton, A. (2011). Extending the use of scenario planning and MCDA for the evaluation of strategic options. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 62(5), 817–829. https://doi.org/10.1057/jors.2010.90

Ramirez, R., & Wilkinson, A. (2014). Rethinking the 2×2 scenario method: Grid or frames? Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 86, 254–264. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2013.10.020

Rohendi, H., Ghozali, I., & Ratmono, D. (2024). Environmental, social, and governance (ESG) disclosure and firm value: The role of competitive advantage as a mediator. Cogent Business & Management, 11(1), 2297446. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2023.2297446

Schoemaker, P. J. H. (1995). Scenario planning: A tool for strategic thinking. Sloan Management Review, 36(2), 25–40.

Shell. (2025). The energy security scenarios: Energy and AI. Shell plc.

Stewart, T. J., French, S., & Rios, J. (2013). Integrating multicriteria decision analysis and scenario planning—Review and extension. Omega, 41(4), 679–688. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2012.09.003

Teece, D. J., Pisano, G., & Shuen, A. (1997). Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 18(7), 509–533. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199708)18:7<509::AID-SMJ882>3.0.CO;2-Z

Tokac, B., Zhang, Q., & Sari, Y. A. (2025). Environmental and economic comparison of diesel and electric trucks in open-pit mining operations. Journal of Cleaner Production, 507, 145540. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2025.145540

Trigeorgis, L., & Reuer, J. J. (2017). Real options theory in strategic management. Strategic Management Journal, 38(1), 42–63. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2593

Tzeng, G.-H., Lin, C.-W., & Opricovic, S. (2005). Multicriteria analysis of alternative-fuel buses for public transportation. Energy Policy, 33(11), 1373–1383. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2003.12.014

Van der Heijden, K. (1996). Scenarios: The art of strategic conversation. Chichester, England: John Wiley & Sons.

Wack, P. (1985). Scenarios: Uncharted waters ahead. Harvard Business Review, 63(5), 73–89.

Wright, G., Bradfield, R., & Cairns, G. (2013). Does the intuitive logics method, and its recent enhancements, produce "effective" scenarios? Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 80(4), 631–642. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2012.09.003

Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications: Design and methods (6th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Ziegler, M. S., & Trancik, J. E. (2021). Re-examining rates of lithium-ion battery technology improvement and cost decline. Energy & Environmental Science, 14(4), 1635–1651. https://doi.org/10.1039/D0EE02681F

Downloads

Published

2026-11-01

How to Cite

Strategic Scenario Planning for Mining-Fleet Investment Decisions Under Energy-Cost and Carbon Uncertainty. (2026). MOTIVASI, 11(2), 156-170. https://doi.org/10.32502/j6zt2g36