Nutritional Value of Fermented Chicken Manure Using Eubiotics at Different Dosages and Fermentation Times

Authors

  • Rizki Eka Puteri Program Studi Ilmu Perikanan, Fakultas Pertanian, Universitas Sumatera Selatan, Palembang, Sumatera Selatan
  • Rani Ria Rizki Program Studi Ilmu Perikanan, Fakultas Pertanian, Universitas Sumatera Selatan, Palembang, Sumatera Selatan
  • Raudhatus Saadah Program Studi Agribisnis Pangan, Jurusan Rekayasa Teknologi dan Bisnis Pertanian, Politeknik Negeri Sriwijaya, Palembang, Sumatera Selatan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32502/jgsa.v6i2.1439

Keywords:

chicken manure, fish feed , alternative feed , feed fermentation

Abstract

Feed prices remain a major issue in catfish farming due to the continued reliance on imported raw materials, such as fish meal, as the primary source of protein. Efforts are needed to reduce dependence on imported materials with alternative protein sources that are sustainable, economical, and offer good nutritional value. One example of utilizing waste as an alternative raw material for fish feed is chicken manure. Manure is a waste product from broiler and layer chicken farms. However, it still faces challenges, such as its relatively high crude fiber content, making it difficult to apply because it can result in low feed digestibility. Therefore, technology is needed to reduce the crude fiber content in chicken manure so that the material can be utilized optimally. This study aims to determine the appropriate dosage and fermentation time to improve the nutritional quality of chicken manure. This study used the Factorial RAL method with two factors and three replications. The first factor was the eubiotic dosage (0%, 10%, 20%), and the second factor was the fermentation time (0 days, 3 days, 6 days). The results showed a significant interaction between the eubiotic dosage and fermentation time on the percentage of crude protein, crude fiber, and cellulose. The eubiotic dosage significantly affected crude protein, crude fiber, and cellulose. Fermentation time also significantly impacts crude protein, crude fiber, and cellulose. The combination of 20% eubiotic treatment with a 6-day fermentation period was most effective in reducing crude fiber and increasing crude protein in chicken diets.

References

AOAC. 2005. Official Methods of Analysis of AOAC International. 18th ed. Assoc. Off. Anal. Chem., Arlington.

Azizi, Z., DK. Purnamasari dan Syamsuhaidi. Penggunaan Berbagai Jenis Kotoran Ternak Terhadap Pertumbuhan dan Produksi Larva Hermetia illuucens (Kajian Potensi Pakan Unggas. 2018. Jurnal Ilmu dan Teknologi Peternakan Indonesia Volume 4 (1). Hal. 224-230. https://doi.org/10.29303/jitpi.v3i1

Lovell RL. Nutrition of Aquaculture Species. Journal of animal science. 2014; 69 : 4193 4200.

Liu Y, Zhou, Q, Ji C, Mu J, Wang Y, Harrison MT, Liu K, Zhao Y, Zhao Q, Zhang J, Peng T. Microbial Fermentation in Co-Ensiling Forage-Grain Ratoon Rice and Maize to Improve Feed Quality and Enhance the Sustainability of Rice-Based Production System. Resources, Environment and Sustainability. 2025; 20: 1-11. doi.org/10.1016/j.resenv.2025.100205.

Puteri RE, Sa’adah R, Laras RG. Evaluasi Nilai Gizi dan Kandungan Asam Amino pada Kotoran Unggas untuk Pakan Ikan Lele. J.Perikanan. 2022;12(4) : 691 – 698. Doi:10.29303/jp.v12i4.397.

Rahayu YP, Nasution HM, Prasetyo HA. Perbedaan Media Fermentasi terhadap Produksi Sel Tunggal (PST) Menggunakan Kultur Saccharomyces cerivisiae. Journal of Pharmauceutical and Sciences. 2025; 8(2): 740-752. Doi.org/10.36490/journal-jps.com.

Reihani SFS, Darani KK. Influencing Factors on Single-Cell Protein Production by Submerged Fermentation : a Review. Electronic Journal of Biotechnology. 2019; 37 : 34-40. doi.org/10.1016/j.ejbt.2018.11.005.

Steel, R. G. D., & Torrie, J. H. (1980). Principles and Procedures of Statistics: a Biometrical Approach (2nd ed.). McGraw-Hill.

Wang Z, Li Y, Tang H, Luo D, Huang J, Ye B, Yan W, Liu G, Yang Y. Novel Fermentation Strategy Utilizing a Probiotic Complex to Improve the Feeding Value of Distillers’ Grain. Industrial Crops and Products. 2025; 226: 1-16. doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2025.120748.

Van Soest, P. J. Use of detergent in the analysis of fibrous feeds. III. Study of effects of heating and drying on yield of fiber and lignin in forages. 1965. Journal of the Association of Official Analytical Chemists, 48(4), 785-790.

Yanuartono, Nururrozi A, Indarjulianto S, Haribowo N, Purnamaningsih H, Rahardjo S. Manure Unggas: Suplemen Pakan Alternatif dan Dampak Terhadap Lingkungan. J.Biotek & Biosains Indonesia. 2018; 5(2) : 241- 257. doi:10.29122/jbbi.v5i2.2775.

Downloads

Published

14-07-2026

How to Cite

Eka Puteri, R., Ria Rizki, R., & Saadah, R. (2026). Nutritional Value of Fermented Chicken Manure Using Eubiotics at Different Dosages and Fermentation Times. Journal of Global Sustainable Agriculture, 6(2), 91–94. https://doi.org/10.32502/jgsa.v6i2.1439

Issue

Section

Articles

Similar Articles

<< < 1 2 3 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.