KONSTRUKSI DAN VALIDASI INSTRUMEN TES SOCIOSCIENTIFIC ARGUMENTATION SKILLS PADA TOPIK HUTAN MANGROVE : SEBUAH METODE DELPHI
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.32502/didaktikabiologi.v8i2.244Keywords:
argumentasi, metode dhelpi, pembelajaran biologi, socioscientificAbstract
Pengukuran keterampilan berargumentasi diperlukan untuk mengetahui profil keterampilan berargumentasi mahasiswa pada isu socioscientific. Tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk mengkonstruksi dan memvalidasi isi instrumen keterampilan berargumentasi berbasis socioscientific issues (socioscientific argumentation skills) pada topik hutan mangrove mata kuliah Ekologi Tumbuhan di Universitas Veteran Bangun Nusantara. Penelitian ini merupakan bagian dari penelitian pengembangan yaitu perancangan dan pengembangan produk awal. Konstruksi instrumen keterampilan berargumenasi berbasis socioscientific issues dilakukan dengan kajian literatur untuk menentukan dimensi dan indikator keterampilan berargumentasi. Proses validasi isi dari instrumen tes menggunakan metode Delphi. Validasi isi menggunakan 13 validator ahli instrumen evaluasi dan hasil dari skor yang diberikan oleh masing-masing validator selanjutnya dilakukan perhitungan dengan menggunakan koefisien validitas Aiken. Aspek yang dinilai antara lain : materi, konstruksi dan bahasa. Hasil konstruksi instrumen tes menunjukkan bahwa socioscientific argumentation skills mencakup aspek-aspek claim, evidence, reasoning, contemplation dan disusun menjadi 6 indikator serta 8 soal tes essai. Hasil validasi isi oleh 13 validator ahli dengan perhitungan Aiken menunjukkan bahwa 8 soal tes semua valid. Instrumen tes socioscientific argumentation skills yang sudah valid ditinjau dari validitas isi perlu dilanjutkan dengan uji validitas konstruk.
References
Adeleke, A. A., & Joshua, E. O. (2015). Development and Validation of Scientific Literacy Achievement Test to Assess Senior Secondary School Students ’ Literacy Acquisition in Physics. Journal of Education and Practice, 6(7), 28–43. Diakses dari https://iiste.org/Journals/index.php/JEP/article/view/20669
Aydeniz, M., & Ozdilek, Z. (2015). Assessing Pre- Service Science Teachers’ Understanding of Scientific Argumentation : What Do They Know About Argumentation After Four Years of College Science? Science Education International, 26(2), 217–239. Diakses dari https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1064033
Berlian, L., Taufik, A. N., & Iman, A. (2021). Pengembangan Instrumen Tes Argumentasi Tulisan Yang Berorientasi E-Learning Untuk Melatih Keterampilan Argumentasi Mahasiswa. Jurnal Bio Educatio, 6(2), 1–12. https://dx.doi.org/10.31949/be.v6i2.3317
Brookhart, S. M. (2010). How To Assess Higher-Order Thinking Skills In Your Class Room (Vol. 88, Issue 18). Alexandria: ASCD.
Chin, C., & Osborne, J. (2010). Supporting argumentation through students’ questions: Case studies in science classrooms. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 19(2), 230–284. https://doi.org/10.1080/10508400903530036
Christenson, N., Chang Rundgren, S. N., & Höglund, H. O. (2012). Using the SEE-SEP Model to Analyze Upper Secondary Students’ Use of Supporting Reasons in Arguing Socioscientific Issues. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 21(3), 342–352. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-011-9328-x
Dinar, A. W. (2016). Pengembangan Instrumen Penilaian Autentik Dalam Pembelajaran Biologi Materi Fungi Kelas X SMA/MA. BioEdu: Berkala Ilmiah Pendidikan Biologi, 5(3), 571–579. Diakses dari https://ejournal.unesa.ac.id/index.php/bioedu/article/view/19433
Evagorou, M., Nielsen, J. A., & Dillon, J. (2020). Science Teacher Education for Responsible Citizenship. Springer Nature Switzerland AG. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-40229-7
Fadillah, E. N. (2017). Pengembangan Instrumen Penilaian Untuk Mengukur Keterampilan Proses Sains Siswa SMA. Didaktika Biologi: Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan Biologi, 1(2), 123–134. https://doi.org/10.32502/dikbio.v1i2.770
Ginanjar, W. S., Utari, S., & Muslim, D. (2015). Penerapan Model Argument-Driven Inquiry Dalam Pembelajaran Ipa Untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Argumentasi Ilmiah Siswa Smp. Jurnal Pengajaran Matematika Dan Ilmu Pengetahuan Alam, 20(1), 32. https://doi.org/10.18269/jpmipa.v20i1.559
Gott, R., & Duggan, S. (2007). A framework for practical work in science and scientific literacy through argumentation. International Journal of Phytoremediation, 25(3), 271–291. https://doi.org/10.1080/02635140701535000
Heng, L. L., Surif, J., & Seng, C. H. (2014). Individual versus group argumentation: Student’s performance in a Malaysian context. International Education Studies, 7(7), 109–124. https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v7n7p109
Heong, Y. M., Othman, W. B., Yunos, J. B. M., Kiong, T. T., Hassan, R. Bin, & Mohamad, M. M. B. (2011). The Level of Marzano Higher Order Thinking Skillsamong Technical Education Students. International Journal of Social Science and Humanity, 1(2), 121–125. https://doi.org/10.7763/ijssh.2011.v1.20
Iordanou, K. (2022). Supporting strategic and meta ‑ strategic development of argument skill : the role of reflection. Metacognition and Learning, 17, 399–425. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-021-09289-1
Izzania, R. D. S. M., Winarni, E. W., & Agusdianita, N. (2020). Pengaruh Penggunaan Model Problem Based Learning pada Materi Siaga Bencana terhadap Kemampuan Literasi Sains Siswa Kelas IV SD Negeri Kota Bengkulu. Juridikdas Jurnal Riset Pendidikan Dasar, 3(3), 381–390. https://doi.org/10.33369/juridikdas.3.3.381-390
Jiménez-Aleixandre, M. P., & Erduran, S. (2007). Argumentation in Science Education: An Overview (pp. 179–199). The Netherlands: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-6670-2_9
Kaniawati, I., & Suhandi, A. (2014). Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Pembangkit Implementation of Generate Argument Instructional Model Using Scientific Method To Increase the Cognitive Abilities and. 10(2), 104–116. https://doi.org/10.15294/jpfi.v10i2.3347
Kuhn, D. (2010). Teaching and learning science as argument. Science Education, 94(5), 810–824. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20395
Lawson, A. E. (2003). The nature and development of hypothetico-predictive argumentation with implications for science teaching. International Journal of Science Education, 25(11), 1387–1408. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069032000052117
Lewis, A. (1985). Three coefficients for analysing Reliability and Validity of rating. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 45. https://doi.org/10.1177/07399863870092005
McNeill, K. L. (2011). Elementary students’ views of explanation, argumentation, and evidence, and their abilities to construct arguments over the school year. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 48(7), 793–823. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20430
Moore, P. G., Lingstone, H. A., & Turoff, M. (1977). The Delphi Method: Techniques and Applications. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. Series A (General), 140(2), 257. https://doi.org/10.2307/2344913
Murgado-Armenteros, E. M., Torres-Ruiz, F. J., & Vega-Zamora, M. (2012). Differences between online and face to face focus groups, viewed through two approaches. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Electronic Commerce Research, 7(2), 73–86. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-18762012000200008
Muslim, M., & Suhandi, A. (2012). Pengembangan Perangkat Pembelajaran Fisika Sekolah Untuk Meningkatkan Pemahaman Konsep Dan Kemampuan Berargumentasi Calon Guru Fisika. Jurnal Pendidikan MIPA, 13(2), 96–104. https://doi.org/10.23960/jpmipa/v13i2.pp96-104
Nugroho, A. A. (2017). The implementation of collaborative-based guided discovery reviewed from students’ analytical thinking skills and social skills. Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan IPA, 3(2), 128. https://doi.org/10.21831/jipi.v3i2.14508
Nugroho, A. A., & Subiyantoro, S. (2017). Pengembangan Modul Sistematika Tumbuhan Tinggi Berbasis Guided Discovery untuk Mengembangkan Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Mahasiswa Pendidikan Biologi. Bio-Pedagogi, 6(2), 19. https://doi.org/10.20961/bio-pedagogi.v6i2.20696
Ogan-Bekiroglu, F., & Eskin, H. (2012). Examination of the relationship between engagement in scientific argumentation and conceptual knowledge. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 10(6), 1415–1443. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-012-9346-z
Ongardwanich, N., Kanjanawasee, S., & Tuipae, C. (2015). Development of 21st Century Skill Scales as Perceived by Students. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 191, 737–741. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.04.716
Pallant, A., & Lee, H. S. (2015). Constructing Scientific Arguments Using Evidence from Dynamic Computational Climate Models. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 24(2–3), 378–395. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-014-9499-3
Plomp, T. (2013). Educational Design Research: A Introduction. In Educational Design Research (pp. 10–51).
Presley, M. L., Sickel, A. J., Muslu, N., & Merle-Johnson, D. (2013). A Framework for Socio-scientifi c Issues Based Education. Science Educator, 22(1), 26–32. Diakses dari https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1062183
Putri, F. D. (2020). Pengembangan Instrumen Tes Kemampuan Berargumentasi Pada Materi Impuls Dan Momentum. Khazanah Pendidikan, 14(1), 44–57. https://doi.org/10.30595/jkp.v14i1.8463
Sadler, T. D., & Fowler, S. R. (2006). A threshold model of content knowledge transfer for socioscientific argumentation. Science Education, 90(6), 986–1004. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.20165
Simon, S. (2008). Using Toulmin’s Argument Pattern in the evaluation of argumentation in school science. International Journal of Research and Method in Education, 31(3), 277–289. https://doi.org/10.1080/17437270802417176
Tawil, & Liliasari. (2013). Berpikir Kompleks dan Implementasinya dalam Pembelajaran IPA. Penerbit UNM.
Tracey, M. W., & Richey, R. C. (2007). ID model construction and validation: A multiple intelligences case. Educational Technology Research and Development, 55(4), 369–390. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-006-9015-4
van den Akker, J., Gravemeijer, K., McKenney, S., & Nieveen, N. (2006). Educational Design Research. In Educational Design Research. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203088364
Weiss E., R. (2003). Designing problems to promote higher-order thinking. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 2003(95), 25–31. https://doi.org/10.1002/tl.109
Yousuf, M. I. (2007). Using Experts` Opinions Through Delphi Technique - Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation. Practical Assessment, Research and Evaluation, 12(4), 1–9. Diakses dari https://www.researchgate.net/publication/253041760_Using_Experts'_Opinions_Through_Delphi_Technique
Z, R. P., Sari, R., Jumadi, J., & Ariswan, A. (2020). Pengembangan dan Validasi Instrumen Tes untuk Mengukur Keterampilan Menyelesaikan Masalah Peserta Didik SMA pada Pelajaran Fisika. Jurnal Penelitian Pembelajaran Fisika, 11(1), 17–26. https://doi.org/10.26877/jp2f.v11i1.3993
Živkovic, S. (2016). A Model of Critical Thinking as an Important Attribute for Success in the 21st Century. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 232(April), 102–108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.10.034
