Unseen Barriers in Invertebrate Practicals: Students' Cognitive, Logistical, and Affective Experiences

Bimo Aji Nugroho; Imudya Putri Hanifah

doi:10.32502/2sjad092

Authors

Bimo Aji Nugroho Universitas Borneo Tarakan
Imudya Putri Hanifah Universitas Borneo Tarakan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.32502/2sjad092

Keywords:

invertebrate practicum, field-based learning, student experiences, assessment fairness

Abstract

Lecturers often overlook obstacles in the practical learning process. These obstacles in the practical process are dynamic elements that the lecturer has designed. As a result of the overlooked obstacles, students feel unfairly treated during the practical process. Therefore, this research aims to explore students' subjective experiences in order to uncover the obstacles and dynamics involved in the practical process. A qualitative approach was used to gather data from 73 students through open-ended questionnaires. Data were analyzed using thematic analysis, with validation through peer debriefing techniques and inter-coder agreement to ensure validity. The research results identified four themes: (1) the density of class material and the need for pre-practical guidance; (2) obstacles due to geographical distance and group discrimination; (3) the affective transformation of students and the importance of the lecturer's presence in the field; and (4) damage to documents on devices and bias in grading penalties. These findings demonstrate that lecturers have overlooked obstacles in the practical process. This indicates that these obstacles will lower confidence in the classroom due to the inability to engage in the practical process. As a recommendation, lecturers need to implement a process-oriented assessment rubric, provide logistical flexibility for field assignments, and offer space for offline report writing.

References

Aggarwal, P., & O’Brien, C. L. (2008). Social loafing on group projects: Structural antecedents and effect on student satisfaction. Journal of Marketing Education, 30(3), 255–264. https://doi.org/10.1177/0273475308322283.

Albudaiwi, D. (2017). Survey: Open-Ended Questions. In The SAGE Encyclopedia of Communication Research Methods, 1716–1717. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781483381411.n608.

Bandura, A. (1977). Self-Efficacy: The exercise of control. https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:142746089.

Boysen, G. A. (2015). Uses and misuses of student evaluations of teaching: The interpretation of differences in teaching evaluation means irrespective of statistical information. Teaching of Psychology, 42(2), 109–118. https://doi.org/10.1177/0098628315569922.

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706QP063OA.

Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.

Downing, V. R., Cooper, K. M., Cala, J. M., Gin, L. E., & Brownell, S. E. (2020). Fear of negative evaluation and student anxiety in community college active-learning science courses. CBE Life Sciences Education, 19(2), 1-16. https://doi.org/10.1187/CBE.19-09-0186.

Firda, A., Rikizaputra, Afidah, M., Awal, R., & Sari, E. (2026). Analisis Miskonsepsi tentang jaringan hewan dan tumbuhan pada siswa SMAN 6 Pekanbaru. Jurnal Karya Ilmiah Multidisiplin, 6(1), 46–53. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.31849/jurkim.v6i1.31722.

Guo, Y. Y., Cai, H., Bramley, G. L. C., Atkins, H. J., Li, B., & Theodossiades, S. (2025). A review of artificial intelligence in herbarium specimen image analysis. Artificial Intelligence Review, 58(12), article number 402. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10462-025-11408-2.

Habelrih, E. A., & Hicks, R. E. (2015). Psychological well-being and its relationships with active and passive procrastination. International Journal of Psychological Studies, 7(3), 25-34. https://doi.org/10.5539/ijps.v7n3p25.

Hakim, N., Maghfira, I. K, Wirayudha, P. B., Rauzatul, C., Salsabila, U. F. Z., & Riamanda, I. (2025). Coping strategies of students experiencing social anxiety in the academic context. Jurnal Psikologi Terapan, 8(1), 1–12. https://ojs.unimal.ac.id/jpt/article/view/22046.

Hendrawan, K., Mardi, & Susita, D. (2024). From digital natives to agile learners: Rethinking digital skills among generation Z. International Journal of Human Capital Management, 8(2), 88–99. https://journal.unj.ac.id/unj/index.php/ijhcm/article/view/60297.

Hornstein, H. A. (2017). Student evaluations of teaching are an inadequate assessment tool for evaluating faculty performance. Cogent Education, 4(1), article 1304016. https://doi.org/10.1080/2331186X.2017.1304016.

Ismail, S. M., Rahul, D. R., Patra, I., & Rezvani, E. (2022). Formative vs. summative assessment: impacts on academic motivation, attitude toward learning, test anxiety, and self-regulation skill. Language Testing in Asia, 12(1), article number 40. https://doi.org/10.1186/S40468-022-00191-4.

Jafarpoor, H., Hosseini, M., Sohrabi, M., & Mehmannavazan, M. (2021). The effect of direct observation of procedural skills/mini-clinical evaluation exercise on the satisfaction and clinical skills of nursing students in dialysis. Journal of Education and Health Promotion, 10(1), 74. https://doi.org/10.4103/JEHP.JEHP_618_20.

Jawed, M., Ali, K., & Ahmed, T. (2025). Exploring the connection between presence and absence of krashen’s theory on learner’s input and affective filters: a triangulation approach. Journal of Arts and Linguistics Studies, 3(2), 1811–1839. https://doi.org/10.71281/jals.v3i2.305.

Job, L. P. (2024). Breaking the silence: Overcoming fear and building confidence in english speaking-a personal journey. The Academic, 2(10), 197–201. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14101411.

Juhász, Á., Sebestyén, N., Árva, D., Barta, V., Pártos, K., Vokó, Z., & Rákosy, Z. (2024). We need better ways to help students avoid the harms of stress: Results of a meta-analysis on the effectiveness of school-based stress management interventions. Journal of School Psychology, 106, 101352. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JSP.2024.101352.

Kolb, D. A. (2015). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. Pearson Education, Inc.

Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic Inquiry. Sage Publications, Inc.

Meitri, I. D. A. K., & Darmayanti, N. W. S. (2025). Identifikasi kesulitan guru dalam mengajar praktikum. Wahana Chitta Jurnal Pendidikan, 7(1), 42–48. https://jurnal.markandeyabali.ac.id/index.php/wahanachitta/article/view/325.

Mekonnen, L. (2025). Improving students’ self-confidence in learning through action research: Presentation skills in focus Improving students’ self-confidence in learning. Indonesian Journal of Classroom Action Research, 3, 26–36. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.53866/ijcar.v3i1.753.

Miocic, I., Vukovic, M. B., & Ledic, J. (2020). The positive attitude approach for teaching in higher education: An untrodden path for policy and practice. European Journal of Education, 55(4), 560–572. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.12420.

Ng, S. F., Hassan, N. S. I. C., Nor, H. M. N., & Malek, N. A. A. (2017). The relationship between smartphone use and academic performance: A case of students in a Malaysian Tertiary Institution. Malaysian Online Journal of Educational Technology, 5(4), 58–70. https://doi.org/https://mojet.net/index.php/mojet/article/view/110.

Nur’aeni, A. L., Sholihah, R. N., Riandi, & Widodo, A. (2022). Analisis inovasi media gambar pada materi keanekaragaman hayati menggunakan aplikasi inaturalist. BIODIK: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Biologi, 8(4), 133–138. https://doi.org/10.22437/bio.v8i4.19115.

Othman, A., Osman, K., & Othman, N. (2024). Assessment value: A Systematic literature review on assessment as, for and of learning in school. International Journal of Academic Research in Progressive Education and Development, 13(1), 995–1013. https://doi.org/10.6007/ijarped/v13-i1/20725.

Owen, J. A. T., Ellis, C., & Goffman, E. (2008). Naturalistic Inquiry. In The SAGE Encyclopedia of Qualitative Research Methods. SAGE Publications, Inc. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412963909.n280.

Pokorny, H., Holley, D., & Kane, S. (2016). Commuting, transitions and belonging: the experiences of students living at home in their first year at university. Higher Education, 74(3), 543–558. https://doi.org/10.1007/S10734-016-0063-3.

Prayunisa, F., & Marzuki, A. D. (2024). Analisis Kesulitan dalam pelaksanaan praktikum IPA SD dan IPA Terpadu SMP. NUSRA : Jurnal Penelitian Dan Ilmu Pendidikan, 5(3), 1145–1151. https://doi.org/10.55681/nusra.v5i3.3133.

Pritchett, L., & Beatty, A. (2015). Slow down, you’re going too fast: Matching curricula to student skill levels. International Journal of Educational Development, 40, 276–288. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2014.11.013.

Pye, J. (2025). Direct observations of practice in social work education: the role of professional autonomy in policy enactment. Social Work Education, 44(6), 1454–1470. https://doi.org/10.1080/02615479.2024.2400205.

Qin, Z., Yang, G., Lin, Z., Ning, Y., Chen, X., Zhang, H., & Wong, C. U. I. (2025). The impact of academic burnout on academic achievement: a moderated chain mediation effect from the Stimulus-Organism-Response perspective. Frontiers in Psychology, 16, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.3389/FPSYG.2025.1559330.

Ramírez-Castañeda, V., Westeen, E. P., Frederick, J., Amini, S., Wait, D. R., Achmadi, A. S., Andayani, N., Arida, E., Arifin, U., Bernal, M. A., Bonaccorso, E., Sanguila, M. B., Brown, R. M., Che, J., Condori, F. P., Hartiningtias, D., Hiller, A. E., Iskandar, D. T., Jiménez, R. A., … Tarvin, R. D. (2022). A set of principles and practical suggestions for equitable fieldwork in biology. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 119(34), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1073/PNAS.2122667119.

Rastogi, S., Gupta, S., Deepak, D., Mishra, B. N., Gore, R., & Singh, V. (2025). A systematic literature review on anxiety among undergraduate students: causes and coping strategies. Annals of Neurosciences, 33(4), 507-522. https://doi.org/10.1177/09727531251366078.

Sari, I. K., & Hidayati, E. (2020). Cognitive reconstruction to reduce anxiety in grade VI elementary schools. Jurnal Psikologi Integratif, 8(1), 29–40. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.14421/jpsi.v8i1.1969.

Scheerens, J., Glas, C., & Thomas, S. M. (2005). Educational evaluation, assessment, and monitoring. Swets & Zeitlinger Publishers.

Sweller, J. (1988). Cognitive load during problem solving: Effects on learning. Cognitive Science, 12(2), 257–285. https://doi.org/10.1016/0364-0213(88)90023-7.

Sweller, J. (2011). Cognitive load theory. Psychology of Learning and Motivation - Advances in Research and Theory, 55, 37–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-387691-1.00002-8.

Tamba, Y. R., Napitupulu, M. A., & Sidabukke, M. (2020). Analisis kesulitan belajar siswa pada materi hewan invertebrata di kelas X. Jurnal Pelita Pendidikan, 8(1), 80–88. https://doi.org/10.24114/jpp.v8i1.11321.

Tripp, T. M., Jiang, L., Olson, K., & Graso, M. (2019). The fair process effect in the classroom: Reducing the influence of grades on student evaluations of teachers. Journal of Marketing Education, 41(3), 173–184. https://doi.org/10.1177/0273475318772618.

Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes (M. Cole, V. John-Steiner, S. Scribner, & E. Souberman, Eds.). Harvard University Press.

Wang, J., Wang, Z., Yang, Y., Wang, T., Lin, H., Zhang, W., Chen, X., & Fu, C. (2025). Academic burden and emotional problems among adolescents: A longitudinal mediation analysis. Journal of Adolescence, 97(4), 989-1001. https://doi.org/10.1002/JAD.12471.